If their remarks share a thread, we think it's the speakers' implied declaration
that printing technology has finally crossed a threshold into new territory
bearing scant resemblance to the country left behind. Now there is a new
set of assumptions to work with and a new frame of reference to construct.
For example, it was surprising to hear the phrase “evolutionary vs. revolutionary” used
so little at the show. Once upon a time, this well-worn scrap of rhetoric
keynoted nearly every deep discussion and spouted from nearly every learned
lip. But this year, it was as if everyone had come to Chicago agreeing that
the “evolution” of printing simply has brought the medium to where it ought
to be, and that “revolutions,” whatever else they may be, are just distractions
from the far more urgent matter of making money with the tools at hand.
Perhaps a new way of thinking, speaking (and writing) about graphic communications
is beginning to displace the old. Listen:
"Printers are recognizing
the need to upgrade their platforms. They understand that today,
being competitive means continually increasing productivity.
It's no longer practical to pay off the cost of a press in seven
or eight years, and then run it for another 20. Those days are
gone. Press manufacturers must cater to a demand for design flexibility
in their equipment. Nobody wants just a plain-vanilla, six-color 40" coater
any more. Press manufacturers should be prepared to deliver special one-off
designs for specialized applications."
—Stephan Carter, president Komori America
Corp.
"Thanks to improvements in technology, we're able to go to a
customer and say, if need be, “We haven't been able get the color just
right, but we'll correct it by making a new plate.” With our equipment,
it might take 15 minutes to image a new plate, and another five
minutes to hang it. So, a plate remake isn't the catastrophic interruption
that it once was, and even though our plate remake rates can be high
on some jobs, we're willing to go that extra mile for the customer."
—Brian
W. Mason, CEO, Great Western Industries, a Dallas, Tex. provider of folding
cartons, POS materials, collectible cards, and secure printing
"In the printing industry today, CIM (computer integrated manufacturing)
is the difference between survival and success. It is the hallmark
of printers who are thriving while everyone else seems to be
running for cover."
—Yves
Rogivue, CEO, MAN Roland Inc.
"CIM is here, it's working, and it's available for real people. The bindery
is no longer the second-class citizen of CIM."
—Werner Naegeli, president
and CEO, Muller Martini Corp.
"Printing has been loath to get its message out. We need to change our
focus. It is hard to fathom how print has settled for such obscurity
in the face of other media. Printers must stop trying to position themselves
as alternatives to other printers and start positioning print
as an alternative to competitive media. As an industry, we've failed to
deliver a consistent, coherent message about the advantages of our medium.
"
—Michael Makin, CEO, Graphic Arts Technical Foundation/Printing
Industries of America (in remarks at the announcement of The Print Council,
a business alliance promoting greater use of print)
"Several current trends could drive up demand for printing:
decreased use of telemarketing (despite uncertainty about the fate of
the do-not-call registry); decreased volume of spam thanks to spam-blocking
technology and anti-spam legislation; and the commercial-skipping feature
of the TiVo home television recording system. Because of these constraints
on competitive media, print is at the verge of a new and significant growth
period. "
—Paul Reilly, board chairman, CEO, and president, Mail-Well
Inc. (in remarks at the announcement of The Print Council)
"Print's
real value proposition is simple: The high value-add in any
plant is the finishing. Printers who overlook this fact mislead
themselves. They think they're printers, but they're not—they're finishers.
No customer ever orders or buys flat sheets of paper.
If you are an in-plant,
the critical need for rapid turnaround times requires the finishing
to be in-house. If you're going to be an in-plant, you need to
be a finisher.
Print begins with postpress. The printing is only a part
of it. And no matter what kind of job it is, print finishers
have remember that production variables must always be anticipated
and accounted for. Paper still comes from trees, and God didn't make any
two trees alike."
—Larry Tanowitz, senior vice president, postpress, Heidelberg
USA
"Technically speaking, these are not great times for the
early innovators. The technology advantage that they enjoyed and depended
on for a competitive edge has been opened to all competitive manufacturers.
In many cases the early-adopter stage of technology has been improved
upon by manufacturers who have developed systems later. This means that
the smaller printers now have access to technology that seemed totally
out of their reach even a couple of years ago.
Discernable differences
in performance between 'high-end' products and
other makes of presses are few, if they exist at all. This results
in an overall lower cost to the late adopter at little or no difference
in the quality of the press or the product it produces. "
—Ernest
Bardocz, president, Grafitec America
"For us, 'top quality' means being
the opposite of a racing horse, which performs well under a certain
set of conditions, but not under others. "
—Winfried Gleue, president
and CEO, Hostmann-Steinberg, a global provider of printing inks