The DRUPA Blog:
Daily Commentary from Andy Tribute
With drupa in full swing, we have asked Andy Tribute to provide his commentary each day for our readers. Andy will be attending for fourteen days - May 5 until May 19. So watch this space daily as Andy will break news and provide insightful commentary on all the happenings at drupa. Please offer your feedback to Andy via email: tribute@attributes.co.uk.
Archives: May 6-10 | May
11-15 | Home
May 15, 2004
The Skoda Factor
The above heading will mean nothing to my readers in North America.
Skoda is a Czech car manufacturer. Some years ago, while Skoda made
good cars, these cars in Western Europe were treated as something
of a joke. If you valued your ‘street cred' (the in crowd), you would
never been seen dead in a Skoda. They were the basis of many jokes.
Skoda was then taken over by the Volkswagen Group. The cars improved
with better quality engineering and funding and were good reliable
cars. Then they started introducing new models based upon Volkswagen
technology and platforms. Soon people realised these were very good
reliable cars. Today an increasing number of people buy Skoda rather
than the equivalent Volkswagen. The realise the car is almost the
same, perhaps better in the case of the Fabia vs the VW Polo. The
differnce is often quite a few thousand Euro in Skoda's favour. Today
you don't lose street cred in buying a Skoda. You may in fact be recognised
as being financially astute and a member of the in crowd.
Why am I writing this. Well. I wonder if the Skoda factor may be
applied to suppliers to the printing industry. The main ‘premium'
suppliers like Heidelberg, Komori, KBA and MAN Roland sell at prices
well above the prices of many other press suppliers from Eastern Europe
and the Far East. Presses from companies like Poly and Hamada are
today looking increasingly impressive in both specification and build
quality, but are perceived by many as “old Skodas.” Companies like
AB Dick are perceived as selling into lower quality areas. Products
from these companies and others today appear very comparable in specification
to those of the premium suppliers, but are at lower prices.
What would be the situation if the Skoda factor comes into the press
market. Will people pay more for these Skoda companies, or will the
premium brand suppliers be forced to drop their prices.
There is however good news from the car industry for the premium
brands. Printers like to boast of their presses, and they may follow
the approach of the owners of Mercedes and BMW. Recently Volkswagen
Group have introduced their premium model, the Phaeton. This looks
at least as good as Mercedes or BMW, but it appears that while this
is a wonderful car, its image is not that of the premium brands. Can
you imagine a printer boasting to his clients that he has bought a
new ‘brandX' product rather than the latest Heidelberg. Perhaps again
the brand X suppliers should follow the route of Toyota, Nissan and
Honda in the USA. To sell against the German premium car brands they
invented new names of Lexus, Infinity and Acura.
How about a competition for coming up with new names for AB Dick,
Hamada, Poly, RISO and others?
CtP Status
Yesterday I indicated that there appears to be a change occurring
in the way CtP is being viewed. At the last drupa if we were to believe
forecasts before the event, it was almost as though visible light
CtP was to be given the last rights. Instead violet diode technology
arrived and breathed new life into visible light CtP. At this drupa
we see violet diode visible light CtP (VDVL CtP) really being seen
as a true alternative approach to thermal imaging. There are now a
number of plates rather than just the Agfa Lithostar we had in 2000.
The new photopolymer plates from Agfa, Fuji, Lastra and others have
really changed the situation. These plates give very comparable results
to the best thermal plates, and they too can be baked for very long
runs. The only major player as yet without a violet plate is KPG,
but this is expected to be announced at GraphExpo in October. Rumour
has it that it may be seen at NEXPO next month. That is not to say
silver plates are going away. These Agfa and Mitsubishi plates are
still very important.
The benefits of VDVL CtP are being increasingly seen in lower purchase
costs and lower running costs. At present the technology is mainly
being seen for the 2, 4 and 8-page markets. With the new Cobalt 32
from Escher-Grad and the larger format Krause units it is now entering
the VLF markets. At present none of the VDVL CtP units are offering
10 micron spot FM screening, which is a benefit of a few of the thermal
systems. This ultra-high quality is still an exclusive domain for
thermal imaging.
There is also the situation of process free plates. The excellent
report by Cary Sherburne in yesterday's whattheything.com outlined
all the plates that available. It failed however to say that most
of these plates are at least 40-50% more expensive than other plates,
and also much slower to image. Most assessment of the state of process
free at drupa is that it is still more of statement of jam tomorrow
rather than jam today.
I have already discussed the situation concerning conventional plate
CtP. This with the UV light devices from Basys Print and Esko-Graphics,
and the ink jet devices from Glunz & Jensen, JetPlate and TechNova
is also generating great interest.
Do You Speak Australian?
I have been given an essential guide for Australian staff of one
of the largest exhibitors at the show. This list a few key phases
and how to say them in German. These include important messages like, “Do
you speak English?”, “Is this the correct tram for the Messe?”, and “Is
this the correct tram for the town centre?”
There are however two very important messages for Australians, which
may well be useful for other nationalities, so I am helping visitors
by reprinting them in full here.
Ich denke das ich zu viel getrunken habe
I think I have had too much to drink.
Halt, ich muss mich übergeben
Stop the taxi, I'm going to throw up.
May 14, 2004
Ink Jet CtP
I am starting to see what may be a fundamental shift in approach
in CtP systems. Suddenly thermal is not seen as the core technology
for the future, and may be moving towards being a specific technology
only for certain markets. It appears that Michael Mittelhaus, one
of the top CtP consultants and analysts worldwide, is coming to the
same conclusions. I will write more on this later. Michael should
have his ideas in a future Seybold Report.
One of the most interesting areas at drupa is ink jet CtP. OK, this
is not new. Pisces was doing this with its JetPlate product before
going out of business last year. It is now back as JetPlate Systems.
The key new arrival is the leading processor supplier, Glunz & Jensen.
Ink jet CtP is using an ink jet printer, which may be modified, to
image directly to an aluminum printing plate. In the case of JetPlate
they image a solution through an Epson printer onto a conventioanl
coated plate, and this solution when heated andprocessed generates
the image on the plate. Glunz & Jensen images a special proprietary
solution onto an uncoated wipe on type of plate, and this generates
the image. JetPlate is shipping printers, but Glunz & Jensen is
enhancing its system ready for a launch at GraphExpo in October. Both
are priced well under $50,000 for a complete solution. These are not
for cheap printing, but are producing good quality plates for colour
printing.
This is a must look at technology for smaller printers. It is likely
to have an impact on the market for spreading CtP into smaller printers.
It is also another CtP system for imaging conventional plates.
Halftone Dot Proofing RIP
Oops! Typo error in the heading. It should read Halftone Dot Proofing
R.I.P. At drupa in 2000 there were many suppliers offering solutions
using doner material for imaging true 100% accurate halftone dot proofs.
This was not new however. Kodak had been offering this for years with
their Approval system. At drupa we had a new system for this from
Fujifilm, plus other systems that imaged the proof on the same CtP
device that is also used for imaging the plate. The major one of these
was the Creo Trendsetter Spectrum. We had new thermal doner proofing
materials from DuPont, Imation and Kodak.
In my opinion, with a few exceptions, it appears that this is now
technology of the past. I know Kodak has sold ten Approvals at the
show, but I have to say that there are always people who don't know
at which station to change trains. The train that has long ago left
the station and which has totally taken over is large format ink jet
printing. this is either using specialised engines, as in the Agfa
Sherpa range, or off the shelf HP or Epson engines, as with Creo Integris.
This change does not surprise me. I projected the death of halftone
dot thermal transfer proofing before the last drupa. Perhaps I was
using too strong a pair of spectacles to look to far into the future.
Today no spectacles are needed. Contract quality colour proofing is
now a 100% ink jet market. There are many excellent suppliers that
are following the lead set by the trail brazers, Agfa and Best. All
the key suppliers are now well on the train which is now running at
full speed.
Meanwhile for thermal transfer halftone dot proofing, Rest In Peace!
May 13, 2004
ECRM is Back
That headline may seem strange, as they have never gone away. The
meaning is that ECRM is now back as a key CtP supplier. In the boom
days of CtF, ECRM was one of the core players supplying both newspaper
and commercial machines. ECRM was the Ford or General Motors of the
CtF industry. Excellent well manufactured equipment that was both
cost and performance effective. When CtP started, ECRM really lost
its way. Its initial CtP machines were to put it politely, real dogs.
The company lost market share and was seen as being on a downhill
slope. In the past couple of years it has changed its approach to
CtP, building on the technologies that are well proven in CtF. This
started with a 2 and 4 page machine, and the ideal entry-level newspaper
CtP system.
At drupa ECRM's highlights are a very impressive and cost effective
8-page CtP machine, which sells for under $90,000. They also show
a very neat autoload facility for the 4-page CtP and newspaper engine.
No doubt this will soon find its way to the 8-page machine.
The ECRM machines reflect the company's strategy that CtP should
cost little or no more than CtF. The products look really good, and
emphasize the challenge that is now coming to thermal devices from
violet diode visible light units.
Welcome back ECRM.
Response on CtP Service Costs
It is a nice thing about blogging that one gets interesting replies.
The following came after yesterday's post on the high service cost
of thermal CtP.
Hi Andy,
Just got back from DRUPA a couple of days ago myself. I would
send my entire company over if we could convince our customers that
we needed to shut down for a few days, not to mention the deals
that can be made on equipment purchases. Very stimulating environment
for me but I digress….On the cost of thermal ctp versus violet that
you spoke of today, I speak from experience as a Creo Trendsetter
user for almost four years. Are you certain that you are not confusing
the revenues from their service contracts with actual repair costs
or do you consider that one in the same? No, the contracts are not
cheap but I can tell you that many other companies are emulating
their model whereby they have been able to look way into the machine
coming over the internet from Vancouver or wherever, with a technician
on site with wireless headset and sometimes a third technician from
somewhere else patched in. Think SWAT team. The machine does not
stay down for long when it does very occasionally go down. I know
other printers who have struggled mightily with their non-thermal
platesetters.
Really enjoy the column…keep up the good work. Jamie Bentley
New Printing Definitions
In the interest of helping a greater understanding of the digital
changes with commercial printing, I have decided to start the production
of a new dictionary of printing terms. This is designed to help people
understand their sales person when they are trying to sell a product.
It is also to help journalists when we go to press conferences and
read sales literature from the suppliers. I will be entering the first
few definitions and would ask people to add new definitions as they
work them out. This is a vital service for the industry.
Worlds Fastest: This means that this is the fastest
machine this supplier has yet built in this segment. They know that
we all have limited memory capacity to remember the speeds and feeds
of other machines, and also most of the journalists don't understand
the technology, so any claim that is made is normally printed.
Smaller Footprint: A new machine that is slightly
smaller than the previous hugely humongously large machine. It does
not mean it is a small machine, so ensure the floor is strong wherever
smaller footprint is mentioned.
Low Cost: The equipment may be low in cost, but
be careful of the high running and service costs.
Got it Wrong with DI
Sorry, I got it wrong, but perhaps the people in the relevant companies
should really find out what is happening.
The imaging system in the Heidelberg Quickmaster 46/4 DI is in fact
modified Pearl Imaging. Presstek is being somewhat coy about what
they have done to improve Pearl to give a sharper smaller imaging
spot. What it allows now is higher quality output and higher quality
commercial screening.
I am advised that it appears that the size of the new Heidelberg
imaging module is a little too large to fit in the Quckmaster 46/4
DI
Did I Get it Wrong with DI?
In an earlier blog entry I stated that the new Heidelberg laser imaging
technology was being used in the latest version of the Heidelberg
Quickmaster 46/4 DI Pro. I may have been wrong. Various people are
telling me the technology is being used, while others tell me that
ProSpot is a Presstek product. It appears even some key people in
Presstek do not know.
I will follow this up to find the truth, even if it means sneaking
into the Heidelberg booth at night with a hammer, spanner and screwdriver
to take the machine apart to find out!
DI however is not seen by Heidelberg as a major market. They appear
incidentally to have dropped the Speedmaster 74 DI from their product
range.
May 12, 2004
Show Business
I am delighted to see that HP has appreciated that its Indigo operation
has a unique way of presenting itself. It is good that the usual bland
corporate HP approach has not been imposed upon Indigo. This can best
be seen by the HP Indigo presence at drupa. There is the usual large
amount of equipment on the stand, leaving little space for visitors.
This has the effect of always making the stand look crowded, which
incidentally it nearly always is. The key thing however is they have
kept the theatre, and the OTT (over the top) presentations in which
Indigo staff exchange their normal business roles to become actors.
This year the show has an active volcano (is this is the replacement
for Benny Landa?), snowfall, etc.
It is great stuff and great fun. It also gets the digital printing
message across in a funny but also educational way. Long may it continue.
Can we expect it at GraphExpo in October?
Thermal or Visible Light CtP
At risk of being accused once again of being anti-thermal technology
for CtP, which would be untrue, I would like to pass on some interesting
facts I found out today at drupa. The suppliers of violet diode visible
light systems state that one of the advantages of their technology
is that it is lower in cost to buy, and lower in cost to run. The
provider of this new information is one of the world's leading suppliers,
a company that sells both violet visible light and thermal CtP, plus
a wide range of plates for both technologies. From analysis of their
servicing costs for both types of technologies, they have found that
the difference in cost of service operations between violet diode
visible light and thermal CtP works out that the thermal systems costs
in excess of $1.80 per sq meter imaged more than violet systems. This
is irrespective of the volume processed. This because of the high
cost of maintenance of thermal heads, and their replacement.
To confirm these figures one only has to look at the Annual Report
of Creo. In this it can be seen that Creo's service income is in excess
of 25% of Creo's revenues. That is predominantly the service cost
of the large base of Creo's thermal CtP systems.
These figures appear to confirm that violet diode CtP imaging has
reduced the costs of CtP, and it is much cheaper than thermal CtP.
With the recent availability of a number of new photopolymer violet
plates we can also see that there is no difference between the systems
now in terms of processing costs. I am also hearing some quotes that
the lifespan of the chemistry in certain violet photopolymer is longer
than for other systems.
May 11, 2004
The DFE Challenge
The Digital Front End (DFE) business for digital presses is dominated
by one company, EFI. With very few exceptions EFI is the supplier
of such DFEs to just about every digital press. Their latest RIP for
the Kodak Versamark sets new standards for DFE performance at up to
1,400 A4 pages/min. The only alternatives up to now have been to use
Creo's Spire controller for certain high-end Xerox printers. There
are also a few home-grown DFEs, such as those for the Kodak Nexpress
and Indigo presses. This drupa we are seeing the DFE situation change
slightly, but perhaps the end result may be that EFI increases its
market share. One interesting development is at Fuji where they have
developed their own POD RIP for the Fuji Xerox Docucolor 6060 presses
in Japan. The question is will this also be used for other FX presses,
and also will it be sold outside of Japan.
Possibly the more serious challenge to EFI may come from a combination
of own grown technology, plus Harlequin technology for PostScript
and PDF processing and ripping. The latest Harlequin RIP is now fully
JDF enabled. This makes it very easy for integrators to build it into
their systems. Harlequin historically has always been the fastest
RIP in the industry, out performing Adobe's CPSI RIP, so if this new
development with their JDF implementation works well, it could allow
other suppliers to make a more serious attack on EFI's market.
One examaple of this is the new controller HP Indigo have for the
new HP Indigo 5000 press. This has an HP Indigo controller in which
the Harlequin RIP Eclipse release is the work horse for keeping the
press running at full speed.
Response to Misinformation
One of the nice things of blogging is it gives me the opportunity
to get a range of interesting replies. From this I often learn about
things happening, or not happening in the industry. The following
is from one of my regular readers.
Your last comment…”are there other items of information
or misinformation that have been given that we now need to re-analyze?.”
I am not sure you are joking or you are being sarcastic. Of course
there is a lot of information that has been presented that is faulty.
I suspect it to be about half of it. One big problem is that the industry
can not tell which half is true and which half is false.
Here are some faults in knowledge as an example.
Ink/water balance and density variation are inherent to the process.
This is false. Steady state density varies because the ink feed going
into the press varies. Modern offset presses do not have positive
and properly designed ink feeds. This is the cause of density variation
and ink water balance. Fix the ink feed and make it feed positively
into the roller train and you will not have steady state density variation
or ink water balance. One will not be able to wash out the print.
So since one has a process that does not have positive control over
it main variable, ink feed, this results in a process that can not
be preset. It also can not be used for doing scientific testing.
Presetting a press for colour requires that the ink feed is capable,
which it is not at this time and it requires the preset data to be
calculated properly. So the industry has for quite some time been
pushing CIP3 and now CIM and JDF. There is all this talk about sending
data to the press but there is no interest to insure that that data
is calculated properly. Assuming that presetting an ink fountain is
based on image coverage area of the plate is false. That assumption
can lead to errors of 40%. This is of no concern to the printing industry
because they have been told that it is based on image area for so
long that they just believe it without thinking.
You suggest that the industry should re-analyze some information.
I would agree but the problem is that they have been and still are
not capable of analyzing the process. Some of the most fundamental
and relatively simple issues of the process have been beyond the capabilities
of the industry to analyze. There are so many poorly understood issues
that the process looks much more confusing than it is.
The assumption that the scientific community in the industry is interested
in science is false. It is actually anti-science because it still
deals with the process as a craft and is not interested in finding
out what is true. The goal of a scientific effort is to develop valid
theories. Descriptions of what happens in experiments is not theory.
They are only observations. The industry mixes up observations with
theory. The scientists in this industry are really quite poor.
Of course this is a sore point with me and I could go on and on,
but I won’t. You are right is suspecting that the information
presented is sometimes not correct. In my area interest, most of it
is incorrect.
Dangerous drupa
drupa is a very dangerous place to be. It has always been dangerous
with the possibily of major facial damage. This is caused by the tubes
holding print samples which people hang on their shoulders. As they
move about these tubes are very likely to hit you in the face as people
push through the crowds around here. This drupa however, it has now
got more dangerous. The company we have to blame for this is Océ.
They are giving out a new item for carrying print samples and other
items. These are “wheely boxes”, which are cardboard boxes on wheels
with a pull handle. Just like the wheely bags we use when travelling.
You all know that airports are now dangerous places as people rush
past you with their wheely backs almost tripping you up.
If you think it is dangerous at an airport, just imagine what is
is like in the heavy crowds at drupa. On one side you are trying to
protect yourself from being knocked out by a shoulder slung print
tube. You duck down to miss this and find you have tripped up over
an Océ wheely box.
Help, I need more insurance!
Heidelberg Core Business
The new approach of Heidelberg is to concentrate on its core businesses
and not get diverted into secondary businesses. The core business
is commercial printing and finishing in the sheet fed offset market.
In this the company wants control over all the key technologies used
within its products. One area that this is seen is in the development
of its own thermal imaging technology. This is being seen in the new
Supersetter CtP range. It may appear that Heidelberg is regularly
changing its mind in how it handles CtP. It had an agreement with
Creo to build and sell the Trendsetter CtP products. This agreement
went sour and was terminated after Creo acquired Scitex, and degrated
its relationship with Heidelberg to one forcing Heidelberg to be the
subservient junior partner. Naturally Heidelberg terminated the agreement.
Following that Heidelberg reached an agreeement for imaging and CtP
delivery technology with Screen. This is an excellent two way agreement
that Heidelberg is very happy with.
In the DI print area Heidelberg has agreements with Presstek for
the Quickmaster 46/4 DI, and with Creo for the Speedmaster 74 DI.
As stated before the agreement with Creo is an unhappy one.The agreement
with Presstek is better but not that good, as indicated by a legal
action instituted by Presstek to try to stop Heidelberg sourcing its
own plate for the Quickmaster DI. On the basis of all this Heidelberg
started the development of its own thermal imaging technology that
could be used for CtP as well as for DI technology products. The first
results of this have been seen at drupa. The Supersetter CtP range
is one example of this, and over time this range will replace the
Topsetter, which uses Screen technology. One reason for this is Heidelberg
preferred for the future a technology that provided greater redundancy
in the the event of an imaging beam failure, than the latest Screen
approach using a 512 beam GLV imaging solution.
What was not announced is Heidelberg has also implemented its new
imaging technology in the Quickmaster 46/4 DI, replacing the old Pearl
imaging technology from Presstek. This provides an immediate benefit
in significant quality and speed improvement making the product more
competitive against the DI products sold under the KBA and KPG brands,
and which are built by Ryobi. It is also being a major test bed for
the future, in the event of new DI products for Heidelberg.
This new imaging technology shows Heidelberg has a very open approach
to future press design. If it sees opportunities for direct imaging
to the press cylinder, or some other equivalent approach, the company
now owns and controls its technology. It will no longer be dependent
upon other companiies, who may see Heidelberg as a cash cow that can
almost be held to ransom. It is a very good move for Heidelberg.
Archives: May 6-10 | May 11-15 | Home
------------------------------------------------
Attributes Associates is an internationally oriented
consulting company specializing in marketing and technology
issues for the printing, publishing and media markets. The
Managing Partner of Attributes Associates is Andrew Tribute,
who is recognized internationally as one of the world's leading
authorities on these industries and subjects.
Attributes' client base comprises a large number of publishers
and printers as well as a significant number of industry vendors.
In most cases consulting is carried out at high level to assist
such organizations in the selection and adoption of technology,
or to define ongoing business strategies covering the likely
future directions of the markets.
Attributes have been in the forefront of technology changes
and market developments from the time it started in 1984. It has
been involved in assisting both users and vendors through the
changes in these industries since then. This has included desktop
publishing; PostScript imaging; changes in working practices in newspaper
and magazine publishing; adoption of digital printing and computer to plate
imaging in commercial printing; and more recently the impact of the Internet
on publishing and printing markets.
|